Clinica Cayanga Medical Resources


Clinical Updates


Clinical Updates
Alzheimer's Disease
Arthritis
Asthma
Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Depression
Diabetes Mellitus
Dyspepsia
Erectile Dysfunction
Fatty Liver
Gallstone
Hepatitis
Hypertension
Lung Cancer
Mesothelioma
Metabolic Syndrome
Obesity
Prostate Cancer
Stroke
Tinnitus
 
Medical Library
Breaking Medical News
Clinical Tools
Dermatology
Diabetes Corner
Evidence-Based Medicine
Free Medical Books
Free Medical Journal
History Taking and Physical Examination
Medical Journal (popular)
Medical Notes
Medical Organizations
Palm Tools
Medical Physiology (Lecture)
Medical Resources
Medical Search
Online Clinical Calculator
 
 

 

Enoxaparin = heparin for acute coronary syndrome (SYNERGY)

 

Clinical Question:
Is low-molecular-weight heparin more effective than unfractionated heparin in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes?

Bottom Line:
In the SYNERGY trial, patients continued to experience adverse cardiac events through long-term follow-up. The effect of enoxaparin on death or MI compared with that of unfractionated heparin at 6 months was similar to that observed at 30 days in the overall trial and in the consistent-therapy group. One-year death rates were also similar in both groups. High-risk patients with ACS remain susceptible to continued cardiac events despite aggressive therapies.

Reference:
High-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with low-molecular-weight or unfractionated heparin: outcomes at 6 months and 1 year in the SYNERGY trial.
Mahaffey KW, Cohen M, Garg J, Antman E, Kleiman NS, Goodman SG, Berdan LG, Reist CJ, Langer A, White HD, Aylward PE, Col JJ, Ferguson JJ 3rd, Califf RM; SYNERGY Trial Investigators. JAMA. 2005 Nov 23;294(20):2594-600.

Study Design:
Randomized controlled trial (double-blinded)


Synopsis:
The SYNERGY trial comparing enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) showed that enoxaparin was not inferior to unfractionated heparin in reducing death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) at 30 days. To evaluate continued risk in this patient cohort through 6-month and 1-year follow-up. Overall, 9978 patients were randomized from August 2001 through December 2003 in 487 hospitals in 12 countries. Patients were followed up for 6 months and for 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Six-month outcomes were death, nonfatal MI, revascularization procedures, stroke, and site-investigator-reported need for rehospitalization; 1-year outcome was all-cause death. Six-month and 1-year follow-up data were available for 9957 (99.8%) and 9608 (96.3%) of 9978 patients, respectively; 541 patients (5.4%) had died at 6 months and 739 (7.4%) at 1 year. Death or nonfatal MI at 6 months occurred in 872 patients receiving enoxaparin (17.6%) vs 884 receiving unfractionated heparin (17.8%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-1.07; P = .65). In the subgroup of patients receiving consistent therapy, ie, only enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin during the index hospitalization (n = 6138), a reduction in death or nonfatal MI with enoxaparin was maintained at 180 days (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95; P = .006). Rehospitalization within 180 days occurred in 858 patients receiving enoxaparin (17.9%) and 911 receiving unfractionated heparin (19.0%) (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.85-1.03; P = .17). One-year all-cause death rates were similar in the 2 treatment groups (380/4974 [7.6%] for enoxaparin vs 359/4948 [7.3%] for unfractionated heparin; HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.92-1.22; P = .44). One-year death rates in patients receiving consistent therapy were also similar (251/3386 [7.4%] for enoxaparin vs 213/2720 [7.8%] for unfractionated heparin; HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.79-1.14; P = .55).

 

 

   

Home | Introduction | Scheduling a Visit| Laboratory Work Reaching Us | Map to our Office | About the Doctors

 

 

 ©2005 Clinica Cayanga. All rights reserved.