Clinica Cayanga Medical Resources


Clinical Updates


Clinical Updates
Alzheimer's Disease
Arthritis
Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Depression
Diabetes Mellitus
Dyspepsia
Erectile Dysfunction
Fatty Liver
Gallstone
Hepatitis
Hypertension
Lung Cancer
Mesothelioma
Metabolic Syndrome
Obesity
Prostate Cancer
Stroke
Tinnitus
 
Medical Library
Breaking Medical News
Clinical Tools
Dermatology
Diabetes Corner
Evidence-Based Medicine
Free Medical Books
History Taking and Physical Examination
Free Medical Journal
Medical Journal (popular)
Medical Organizations
Palm Tools
Medical Physiology (Lecture)
Medical Resources
Medical Search
Online Clinical Calculator
 
 

 

Omeprazole (Losec), ranitidine (Zantac) effective for HP negative dyspepsia (CADET-HN)

 

Clinical question
What is the most effective treatment for patients with Helicobacter pylori negative dyspepsia?

Bottom line
Omeprazole (and to a lesser extent, ranitidine) are somewhat effective for patients with Helicobacter pylori (HP) negative dyspepsia, even if patients with a primary complaint of heartburn or reflux are excluded. The benefit did not persist through the next 5 months when patients could use medications as needed rather than in a scheduled manner. Ranitidine was more cost-effective than omeprazole. It still makes sense to try ranitidine first for these patients, then stepping up to omeprazole if their symptoms are not improved adequately, particularly since this is a benign, self-limited condition.

Reference
Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ, Chiba N, Armstrong D, et al. A randomized trial comparing omeprazole, ranitidine, cisapride, or placebo in Helicobacter pylori negative, primary care patients with dyspepsia: The CADET-HN study. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100:1477-88.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial (double-blinded)

Setting: Outpatient (primary care)

Synopsis
Previous studies have shown that patients with HP positive dyspepsia benefit from eradication of the infection. This study included patients with epigastric pain and a variety of other symptoms (bloating, nausea, early satiety, heartburn, and acid regurgitation) who were HP negative. Patients were excluded with heartburn as a primary symptom, who had symptoms consistent with irritable bowel syndrome, or with red flags for complicated ulcer disease. For the first 2 weeks of the study, the 512 participants recorded their symptoms without treatment. They were then randomized (allocation concealed) to receive either omeprazole (Prilosec) 20 mg once daily, ranitidine (Zantac) 150 mg twice daily, cisapride (Propulsid) 20 mg twice daily, or placebo. Assignment to the cisapride arm was terminated early when that drug was found to cause rare cardiac effects. Patients and outcome assessors were properly blinded and analysis was by intention to treat. Patients took the study medications as directed for the first 4 weeks of the study, and after that were able to take them on an as-needed basis for the final 5 months of the study with an antacid as a rescue medication. The primary outcome was the Global Overall Severity score, a validated 7-point scale, at 4 weeks. All patients had a score of at least 4 during the initial 2 weeks, and success was defined as a score of 0 or 1 (no or minimal symptoms). Approximately 95% of participants in each group completed the 4-week study, and 85% completed the entire 6-month study. Treatment success at 4 weeks was seen in 51% of those taking omeprazole, 36% taking ranitidine, 31% taking cisapride, and 23% taking placebo. Omeprazole was significantly more effective than all the other treatments and placebo (number needed to treat [NNT] compared with placebo = 3; compared with ranitidine = 7). Ranitidine was also more effective than placebo (NNT = 5). The response rate for omeprazole was a bit lower for patients with no or minimal heartburn or regurgitation (49%), a bit better if they had at least mild heartburn or regurgitation (54%). If patients with heartburn as the most bothersome symptom (approximately 1 in 4 patients) were excluded the response rate dropped to 43% (versus 25% for placebo; P = .009). However, there was no significant difference in the percentage of responders between groups at 6 months: 44% for omeprazole, 41% for ranitidine, 40% for cisapride, and 35% for placebo. A subgroup analysis of responders at 4 weeks who remained responders at 6 months remained higher for omeprazole than for ranitidine or placebo (31% vs 21% vs 13.5%; P = .001). Of the active treatment groups, the mean societal cost per patient in Canadian dollars was lower for ranitidine ($225) than for omeprazole ($364). The incremental cost-effectiveness (ie, how much more you have to spend to improve quality of life) was also lower for ranitidine than for omeprazole. However, decreases in the price of omeprazole might alter this calculation.
 

 

 

   

Home | Introduction | Scheduling a Visit| Laboratory Work Reaching Us | Map to our Office | About the Doctors

 

 

 ©2005 Clinica Cayanga. All rights reserved.