Clinica Cayanga Medical Resources


Clinical Updates


Clinical Updates
Alzheimer's Disease
Arthritis
Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Depression
Diabetes Mellitus
Dyspepsia
Erectile Dysfunction
Fatty Liver
Gallstone
Hepatitis
Hypertension
Lung Cancer
Mesothelioma
Metabolic Syndrome
Obesity
Prostate Cancer
Stroke
Tinnitus
 
Medical Library
Breaking Medical News
Clinical Tools
Dermatology
Diabetes Corner
Evidence-Based Medicine
Free Medical Books
History Taking and Physical Examination
Free Medical Journal
Medical Journal (popular)
Medical Organizations
Palm Tools
Medical Physiology (Lecture)
Medical Resources
Medical Search
Online Clinical Calculator
 
 

 

Hyaluronic acid not effective for knee osteoarthritis

 

Clinical question
Are intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid effective for osteoarthritis of the knee?

Bottom line
The evidence that intra-articular hyaluronic acid helps patients with knee osteoarthritis is of poor quality. Improvements in pain at rest and pain during exercise is seen in a minority of studies, and those studies were of lower quality than those showing no benefit. There is no evidence of functional improvement. Injections like this have a potentially powerful placebo effect, so any benefit seen in unblinded studies without concealed allocation is likely represent the placebo effect rather than any effect of the drug.

Reference
Arrich J, Piribauer F, Mad P, Schmid D, Klaushofer K, Mullner M. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 2005; 172:1039-43.

Study design: Meta-analysis (randomized controlled trials)

Setting: Outpatient (specialty)

Synopsis

A previous meta-analysis (JAMA 2003; 290:3115-21) found that intra-articular hyaluronic acid (Synvisc) injections for osteoarthritis of the knee were minimally effective at best, while a recent Cochrane Review (whose authors received funding from the manufacturer) found it much more effective. This meta-analysis looked at the same question, but differed from the previous 2 analyses by examining separate outcomes (pain at rest, pain during exercise, and function), rather than lumping them together. The current study was sponsored by a national insurance program in Austria (we can imagine that they would prefer a more skeptical analysis than the manufacturer). After a careful literature search, 22 randomized controlled trials were included. The study quality was generally poor: only 7 concealed allocation; 6 presented usable data from an intention-to-treat analysis; 16 had blinded outcome assessment; and only 4 did all of this correctly. Eight studies with 468 patients reported 10 outcomes for pain at rest at 2 to 6 weeks. Six of 10 did not demonstrate any benefit; 1 poorly designed, industry-sponsored study reported a large benefit for both 20 mg and 40 mg outcomes. There was too much heterogeneity to combine studies and poorer quality trials tended to find a greater benefit. Nine studies with 1141 patients reported 10 outcomes for pain during exercise. Pooled data at 10 weeks to 14 weeks and 20 weeks to 30 weeks found a statistically -- but probably not clinically -- significant benefit. Hyaluronic acid had no significant effect on function at any time. The previous JAMA analysis found that 17 of 22 trials were industry sponsored.
 

 

 

   

Home | Introduction | Scheduling a Visit| Laboratory Work Reaching Us | Map to our Office | About the Doctors

 

 

 ©2005 Clinica Cayanga. All rights reserved.