CLINICA CAYANGA


Clinical Updates
 

Clinical Daily Updates
Rodolfo T. Rafael, M.D. 
 

 

 

Alzheimer's Disease
Arthritis
Asthma
Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Coronary Artery Disease
Depression
Diabetes Mellitus
Dyspepsia
Erectile Dysfunction
Fatty Liver
Gallstone
Hepatitis
Hypertension
Lung Cancer
Mesothelioma
Metabolic Syndrome
Obesity
Pneumonia
Pregnancy
Prostate Cancer
Sinusitis
Stroke
Tinnitus

 

Ear thermometry is unreliable in detecting fever

 
 
Clinical Question:
How reliable is ear thermometry in detecting fever in children?

Bottom Line:
Pooled estimates of measures of diagnostic accuracy from these studies suggest that infrared ear thermometry would fail to diagnose fever in three or four out of every 10 febrile children (with fever defined by a rectal temperature of 38 degrees C or above). These findings support our previous concerns about the use of infrared ear thermometers in situations where a failure to detect fever has serious implications.

Reference:
Dodd SR, Lancaster GA, Craig JV, Smyth RL, Williamson PR. In a systematic review, infrared ear thermometry for fever diagnosis in children finds poor sensitivity. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:354-357.

Study Design:
Systematic review

Synopsis:
To investigate sensitivity and specificity of infrared ear thermometry compared to rectal thermometry to detect fever in children. Systematic review of studies comparing rectal and infrared ear temperatures in children. Sensitivity and specificity estimates were highly heterogeneous, and displayed an inverse relationship suggestive of a threshold effect, due in part to the different offsets used to obtain adjusted tympanic temperatures depending on the ear thermometer mode. To account for this threshold effect, results from each study were summarized as a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). These varied extensively across studies, suggesting that heterogeneity between study estimates is not fully explained by the threshold effect. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity from random effects models were 63.7% (95% CI 55.6%, 71.8%) and 95.2% (95% CI 93.5%, 96.9%), respectively.

Patient Information

Health For Life

Medical Library

Breaking Medical News
Clinical Tools
Coronary Risk Profile
Dermatology
Diabetes Corner
Evidence-Based Medicine
Free Medical Books
Free Medical Journal
History Taking and Physical Examination
Hows on Making Diagnostic Examination
Medical Journal (popular)
Medical Organizations
Medical Professional News
Neurological and Psychiatric Problems in Clinical Practice
Palm Tools
Medical Notes
Medical Physiology (Lecture)
Medical Resources
Medical Search
Online Clinical Calculator
Scientific Meeting
Online Sari- Sari Store
Please support Clinica Cayanga Medical Resources by purchasing gift items at

Home | Introduction | Scheduling a Visit| Laboratory Work Reaching Us | Map to our Office | About the Doctors

 

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.

 ©2005-2006 Clinica Cayanga. All rights reserved.
clinica.cayanga@gmail.com